Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF
VS
The verdict
9 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.070 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
575-H-HC-BF-DG
565-H-HC-BF
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.070 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.87 %
0.39 pp more efficient
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
218.7 Wp/m²
3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
575 Wp
565 Wp
10 W more power
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
50.20 V
51.85 V
1.65 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.44 A
13.70 A
0.74 A apart
Voltage at max power
42.46 V
44.03 V
1.57 V apart
Current at max power
13.55 A
12.84 A
0.71 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
575-H-HC-BF-DG
18,935 kWh
565-H-HC-BF
18,957 kWh
Lifetime gap
22 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
575-H-HC-BF-DG
565-H-HC-BF
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
575 W
565 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
543 W
540 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
511 W
514 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
479 W
489 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
575-H-HC-BF-DG
565-H-HC-BF
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
575 Wp
565 Wp
+10 W for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.87 %
+0.39 pp for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
218.7 Wp/m²
+3.9 Wp/m² for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage
50.20 V
51.85 V
1.65 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.46 V
44.03 V
1.57 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.44 A
13.70 A
0.74 A apart
Current at max power
13.55 A
12.84 A
0.71 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.070 %/°C for 565-H-HC-BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
32.0 kg
32.0 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for 565-H-HC-BF
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,593
vs
#6,908
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 1,315 places
Power density
#5,549
vs
#6,841
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 1,292 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081
vs
#6,093
565-H-HC-BF leads by 6,988 places
Weight
#10,019
vs
#10,768
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 749 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,950
vs
#5,708
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 758 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.87%); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF is 21.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF bifacial panels?
Both Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.