Skip to main content
570-H-HC-BF-DG vs 575-H-HC-BF 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
570 Wp 22.07 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
575 Wp 22.26 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

575-H-HC-BF leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.070 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter 570-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.070 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage 50.03 V 52.23 V 2.20 V apart
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Short-circuit current 14.38 A 13.84 A 0.54 A apart
Voltage at max power 42.29 V 44.34 V 2.05 V apart
Current at max power 13.48 A 12.97 A 0.51 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
570-H-HC-BF-DG
18,771 kWh
575-H-HC-BF
19,292 kWh
Lifetime gap
521 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 570-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 570 W 575 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 538 W 549 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 507 W 523 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 475 W 497 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 570-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 570 Wp 575 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.07 % 22.26 % Effectively the same
Power density 220.7 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.03 V 52.23 V 2.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.29 V 44.34 V 2.05 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.38 A 13.84 A 0.54 A apart
Current at max power 13.48 A 12.97 A 0.51 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.070 %/°C for 575-H-HC-BF
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.0 kg 32.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.1 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for 575-H-HC-BF
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,136 vs #5,593
575-H-HC-BF leads by 543 places
Power density
#6,058 vs #5,549
575-H-HC-BF leads by 509 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #6,093
575-H-HC-BF leads by 6,988 places
Weight
#10,413 vs #10,019
575-H-HC-BF leads by 394 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,309 vs #4,950
575-H-HC-BF leads by 359 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 22.07%); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.07%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF bifacial panels?
Both Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.