Skip to main content
BBO 510 vs BGO 560 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BGO 560

Bisol BBO 510
Bisol
BBO 510
510 Wp 22.80 % PERC
VS
Bisol
BGO 560
560 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon
The verdict

BGO 560 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter BBO 510 BGO 560 Difference
Rated power 510 Wp 560 Wp 50 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 40.00 V 44.30 V 4.30 V apart
Module area 2.240 m² 2.469 m² 0.229 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 26.0 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell count 108 120 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 33.60 V 37.40 V 3.80 V apart
Dimensions 1975x1134x35 mm 2177x1134x35 mm 1975x1134x35 mm vs 2177x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
BBO 510
17,351 kWh
BGO 560
19,052 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,701 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BBO 510 BGO 560
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 488 W 536 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 466 W 511 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 443 W 487 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BBO 510 BGO 560 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 560 Wp +50 W for BGO 560
Module efficiency 22.80 % 22.70 % Effectively the same
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 226.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 40.00 V 44.30 V 4.30 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.60 V 37.40 V 3.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.10 A 16.00 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.20 A 15.00 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1975x1134x35 mm 2177x1134x35 mm 1975x1134x35 mm vs 2177x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.240 m² 2.469 m² 0.229 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 26.0 kg -2.5 kg for BBO 510
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 46.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.31 %/yr 0.31 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,714 vs #3,307
BBO 510 leads by 593 places
Power density
#3,074 vs #3,465
BBO 510 leads by 391 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#979 vs #1,149
BBO 510 leads by 170 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,687 vs #2,207
BGO 560 leads by 1,480 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BGO 580
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BGO 570
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BBO 520
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BBO 500
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BDO 460
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Bisol
Bisol BBO 510 vs Bisol BDO 450
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Bisol BBO 510 or Bisol BGO 560?
According to our database: Bisol BBO 510 has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Bisol BBO 510 and Bisol BGO 560?
Bisol BBO 510 has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Bisol BGO 560 is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Bisol BBO 510 use vs Bisol BGO 560?
Bisol BBO 510 uses PERC cells; Bisol BGO 560 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Bisol BBO 510 and Bisol BGO 560?
Bisol BBO 510 has a 30 years power warranty; Bisol BGO 560 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 12 Bisol offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.