Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.35 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
16 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Difference
Module efficiency
21.95 %
24.30 %
2.35 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density
219.5 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
23.2 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
2.164 m²
1.998 m²
0.166 m² apart
Weight
26.7 kg
24.5 kg
2.2 kg lighter
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Rated power
475 Wp
485 Wp
10 W more power
Cell count
120
108
12 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage
42.53 V
40.90 V
1.63 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Short-circuit current
14.23 A
14.88 A
0.65 A apart
Dimensions
1908x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1908x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Current at max power
13.49 A
14.15 A
0.66 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
15,937 kWh
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
462 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
485 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
454 W
466 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
432 W
447 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
411 W
428 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
485 Wp
+10 W for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Module efficiency
21.95 %
24.30 %
+2.35 pp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Power density
219.5 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
+23.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Open-circuit voltage
42.53 V
40.90 V
1.63 V apart
Voltage at max power
35.23 V
34.30 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.23 A
14.88 A
0.65 A apart
Current at max power
13.49 A
14.15 A
0.66 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Mechanical
Dimensions
1908x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1908x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.164 m²
1.998 m²
0.166 m² apart
Weight
26.7 kg
24.5 kg
-2.2 kg for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
-5.7 kg/kWp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,745
vs
#131
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,614 places
Power density
#6,702
vs
#140
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,562 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#511
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#10,496
vs
#3,884
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,612 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,017
vs
#2,953
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 2,064 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Bauer Solar
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG vs Bauer Solar BS-470-120M10NHBB-GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Bauer Solar
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG vs Bauer Solar BS-465-120M10NHBB-GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Db
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG or AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 21.95%); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG has a module efficiency of 21.95%, while AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG use vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG uses TOPCon cells; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db bifacial panels?
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Bauer Solar offers · See 171 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

