AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.35 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
16 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
Difference
Module efficiency
24.30 %
21.95 %
2.35 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
219.5 Wp/m²
23.2 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
1.998 m²
2.164 m²
0.166 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
26.7 kg
2.2 kg lighter
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Rated power
485 Wp
475 Wp
10 W more power
Cell count
108
120
12 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
42.53 V
1.63 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Short-circuit current
14.88 A
14.23 A
0.65 A apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1908x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1908x1134x30 mm
Current at max power
14.15 A
13.49 A
0.66 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
16,399 kWh
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
462 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
475 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
466 W
454 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
447 W
432 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
428 W
411 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
475 Wp
+10 W for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Module efficiency
24.30 %
21.95 %
+2.35 pp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
219.5 Wp/m²
+23.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
42.53 V
1.63 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
35.23 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.88 A
14.23 A
0.65 A apart
Current at max power
14.15 A
13.49 A
0.66 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1908x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1908x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.164 m²
0.166 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
26.7 kg
-2.2 kg for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Weight per kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
-5.7 kg/kWp for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#131
vs
#6,745
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,614 places
Power density
#140
vs
#6,702
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,562 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#6,093
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#3,884
vs
#10,496
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 6,612 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,953
vs
#5,017
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 2,064 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Db
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Bauer Solar
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG vs Bauer Solar BS-470-120M10NHBB-GG
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db or Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 21.95%); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG is 21.95%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db use vs Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db uses Back Contact cells; Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty; Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG bifacial panels?
Bauer Solar BS-475-120M10NHBB-GG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 171 AIKO offers · See 5 Bauer Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

