Skip to main content
620TGB/132TS vs 440TGBL/108BB 6 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB

Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS
Axitec
AC-620TGB/132TS
620 Wp 22.95 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Axitec
AC-440TGBL/108BB
440 Wp 22.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

620TGB/132TS leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.93 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
6 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 18 parameters
Parameter 620TGB/132TS 440TGBL/108BB Difference
Module efficiency 22.95 % 22.02 % 0.93 pp more efficient
Rated power 620 Wp 440 Wp 180 W more power
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² 9.3 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 25.0 kg 7.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 39.42 V 8.90 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.24 A 14.13 A 2.11 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 56.8 kg/kWp 4.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 40.61 V 32.74 V 7.87 V apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Current at max power 15.27 A 13.44 A 1.83 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
620TGB/132TS
20,802 kWh
440TGBL/108BB
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,039 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 620TGB/132TS 440TGBL/108BB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 591 W 420 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 562 W 399 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 534 W 379 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 620TGB/132TS 440TGBL/108BB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 440 Wp +180 W for 620TGB/132TS
Module efficiency 22.95 % 22.02 % +0.93 pp for 620TGB/132TS
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² +9.3 Wp/m² for 620TGB/132TS
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 39.42 V 8.90 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.61 V 32.74 V 7.87 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.24 A 14.13 A 2.11 A apart
Current at max power 15.27 A 13.44 A 1.83 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 25.0 kg -7.5 kg for 440TGBL/108BB
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 56.8 kg/kWp -4.4 kg/kWp for 620TGB/132TS
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by Axitec
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,320 vs #6,392
620TGB/132TS leads by 4,072 places
Power density
#2,243 vs #6,391
620TGB/132TS leads by 4,148 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,938 vs #10,964
620TGB/132TS leads by 5,026 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#578 vs #6,151
620TGB/132TS leads by 5,573 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-615TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-610TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-600TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB vs Axitec AC-460TGBL/108WB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB vs Axitec AC-455TGBL/108BB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS or Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB?
According to our database: Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS has higher module efficiency (22.95% vs 22.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB?
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS has a module efficiency of 22.95%, while Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB is 22.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS use vs Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB?
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS uses TOPCon cells; Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB?
Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS has a 30 years power warranty; Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB bifacial panels?
Both Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-440TGBL/108BB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 Axitec offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.