Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS
VS
The verdict
6 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 95 W more power. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
6 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
605TGB/132TS
700TGB/132TS
Difference
Rated power
605 Wp
700 Wp
95 W more power
Weight
32.5 kg
38.0 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.07 A
18.41 A
2.34 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Current at max power
15.12 A
17.31 A
2.19 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
605TGB/132TS
20,299 kWh
700TGB/132TS
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,187 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
605TGB/132TS
700TGB/132TS
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
700 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
577 W
667 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
549 W
635 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
521 W
602 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
605TGB/132TS
700TGB/132TS
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
700 Wp
+95 W for 700TGB/132TS
Module efficiency
22.40 %
22.53 %
Effectively the same
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
47.65 V
48.13 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.02 V
40.44 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.07 A
18.41 A
2.34 A apart
Current at max power
15.12 A
17.31 A
2.19 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
32.5 kg
38.0 kg
-5.5 kg for 605TGB/132TS
Weight per kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
54.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Axitec
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,774
vs
#3,982
700TGB/132TS leads by 792 places
Power density
#4,780
vs
#3,989
700TGB/132TS leads by 791 places
Heat behaviour
#8,005
vs
#8,005
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,739
vs
#8,524
605TGB/132TS leads by 785 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,100
vs
#114
700TGB/132TS leads by 986 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-620TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-615TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-610TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-600TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-710TGB/132TS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Axitec
Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS vs Axitec AC-705TGB/132TS
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS or Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS?
According to our database: Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS use vs Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS uses TOPCon cells; Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS?
Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS has a 30 years power warranty; Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS bifacial panels?
Both Axitec AC-605TGB/132TS and Axitec AC-700TGB/132TS are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Axitec offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.