AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
VS
The verdict
ODA725-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 4 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
4 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ODA725-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.37 %
0.97 pp more efficient
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
725 Wp
695 Wp
30 W more power
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA725-33V-MHD
24,471 kWh
ODA695-33V-MHD
23,458 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,013 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ODA725-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.7% of rated power
701 W
672 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
93.3% of rated power
676 W
649 W
Hot roof
70 °C
90.0% of rated power
652 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ODA725-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
695 Wp
+30 W for ODA725-33V-MHD
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.37 %
+0.97 pp for ODA725-33V-MHD
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
+9.7 Wp/m² for ODA725-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage
49.48 V
49.10 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.92 V
43.02 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
17.71 A
17.22 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
16.55 A
16.18 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.223 %/°C
-0.223 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for ODA725-33V-MHD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#943
vs
#4,970
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 4,027 places
Power density
#936
vs
#4,877
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 3,941 places
Heat behaviour
#1
vs
#1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,879
vs
#9,818
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 2,939 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#261
vs
#1,117
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 856 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.