AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
VS
The verdict
ODA715-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.65 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 4 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
4 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ODA715-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Difference
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.37 %
0.65 pp more efficient
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
715 Wp
695 Wp
20 W more power
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA715-33V-MHD
24,133 kWh
ODA695-33V-MHD
23,458 kWh
Lifetime gap
675 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ODA715-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.7% of rated power
691 W
672 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
93.3% of rated power
667 W
649 W
Hot roof
70 °C
90.0% of rated power
643 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ODA715-33V-MHD
ODA695-33V-MHD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
695 Wp
+20 W for ODA715-33V-MHD
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.37 %
+0.65 pp for ODA715-33V-MHD
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for ODA715-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage
49.36 V
49.10 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.66 V
43.02 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
17.55 A
17.22 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
16.41 A
16.18 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.223 %/°C
-0.223 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#4,970
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 3,173 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#4,877
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 2,859 places
Heat behaviour
#1
vs
#1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,897
vs
#9,818
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 1,921 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#471
vs
#1,117
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 646 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.