AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
VS
The verdict
ODA725-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 4 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
4 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ODA710-33V-MHD
ODA725-33V-MHD
Difference
Module efficiency
22.85 %
23.34 %
0.49 pp more efficient
Power density
228.6 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
710 Wp
725 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA710-33V-MHD
23,965 kWh
ODA725-33V-MHD
24,471 kWh
Lifetime gap
506 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ODA710-33V-MHD
ODA725-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
710 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.7% of rated power
686 W
701 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
93.3% of rated power
663 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
90.0% of rated power
639 W
652 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ODA710-33V-MHD
ODA725-33V-MHD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
710 Wp
725 Wp
+15 W for ODA725-33V-MHD
Module efficiency
22.85 %
23.34 %
+0.49 pp for ODA725-33V-MHD
Power density
228.6 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+4.8 Wp/m² for ODA725-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
49.48 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.53 V
43.92 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
17.47 A
17.71 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
16.34 A
16.55 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.223 %/°C
-0.223 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,604
vs
#943
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 1,661 places
Power density
#2,474
vs
#936
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 1,538 places
Heat behaviour
#1
vs
#1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,457
vs
#6,879
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 1,578 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#618
vs
#261
ODA725-33V-MHD leads by 357 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.85%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 22.85%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.