Skip to main content
ODA700-33V-MHD vs ODA715-33V-MHD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA700-33V-MHD
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA715-33V-MHD
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

ODA715-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA700-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 22.53 % 23.02 % 0.49 pp more efficient
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 700 Wp 715 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA700-33V-MHD
23,627 kWh
ODA715-33V-MHD
24,133 kWh
Lifetime gap
506 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA700-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.7% of rated power 677 W 691 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 93.3% of rated power 653 W 667 W
Hot roof 70 °C 90.0% of rated power 630 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA700-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 715 Wp +15 W for ODA715-33V-MHD
Module efficiency 22.53 % 23.02 % +0.49 pp for ODA715-33V-MHD
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for ODA715-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 49.17 V 49.36 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.21 V 43.66 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.31 A 17.55 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.23 A 16.41 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.223 %/°C -0.223 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.0 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #1,797
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 2,185 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #2,018
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 1,971 places
Heat behaviour
#1 vs #1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,361 vs #7,897
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 1,464 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#928 vs #471
ODA715-33V-MHD leads by 457 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
One difference: cell technology
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.53%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.