Skip to main content
ODA695-33V-MHD vs ODA730-33V-MHD 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA695-33V-MHD
695 Wp 22.37 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA730-33V-MHD
730 Wp 23.50 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

ODA730-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.13 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA695-33V-MHD ODA730-33V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 22.37 % 23.50 % 1.13 pp more efficient
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 695 Wp 730 Wp 35 W more power
Weight per kWp 55.4 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 17.22 A 17.79 A 0.57 A apart
Voltage at max power 43.02 V 44.05 V 1.03 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA695-33V-MHD
23,458 kWh
ODA730-33V-MHD
24,640 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,182 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA695-33V-MHD ODA730-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.7% of rated power 672 W 706 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 93.3% of rated power 649 W 681 W
Hot roof 70 °C 90.0% of rated power 625 W 657 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA695-33V-MHD ODA730-33V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 730 Wp +35 W for ODA730-33V-MHD
Module efficiency 22.37 % 23.50 % +1.13 pp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +11.3 Wp/m² for ODA730-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 49.54 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.02 V 44.05 V 1.03 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.22 A 17.79 A 0.57 A apart
Current at max power 16.18 A 16.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.223 %/°C -0.223 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.4 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,970 vs #716
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 4,254 places
Power density
#4,877 vs #800
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 4,077 places
Heat behaviour
#1 vs #1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,818 vs #6,396
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 3,422 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,117 vs #208
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 909 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
One difference: cell technology
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.