Skip to main content
ODA435-27V-MHD vs ODA410-27V-MHD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA435-27V-MHD
435 Wp 22.28 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA410-27V-MHD
410 Wp 21.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

ODA435-27V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.28 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA435-27V-MHD ODA410-27V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 22.28 % 21.00 % 1.28 pp more efficient
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 210.0 Wp/m² 12.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 435 Wp 410 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 56.8 kg/kWp 60.2 kg/kWp 3.5 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA435-27V-MHD
14,595 kWh
ODA410-27V-MHD
13,756 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA435-27V-MHD ODA410-27V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 410 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 392 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 374 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 356 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA435-27V-MHD ODA410-27V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 410 Wp +25 W for ODA435-27V-MHD
Module efficiency 22.28 % 21.00 % +1.28 pp for ODA435-27V-MHD
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 210.0 Wp/m² +12.8 Wp/m² for ODA435-27V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 38.68 V 37.73 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.06 V 31.13 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 13.91 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.57 A 13.17 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.7 kg 24.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.8 kg/kWp 60.2 kg/kWp -3.5 kg/kWp for ODA435-27V-MHD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,403 vs #9,758
ODA435-27V-MHD leads by 4,355 places
Power density
#5,150 vs #9,772
ODA435-27V-MHD leads by 4,622 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,856 vs #12,408
ODA435-27V-MHD leads by 1,552 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,318 vs #10,862
ODA435-27V-MHD leads by 1,544 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA440-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA430-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD has higher module efficiency (22.28% vs 21.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD has a module efficiency of 22.28%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.