Skip to main content
ODA425-27V-MHD vs ODA415-27V-MHD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA425-27V-MHD
425 Wp 21.76 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA415-27V-MHD
415 Wp 21.25 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

ODA425-27V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA425-27V-MHD ODA415-27V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 21.76 % 21.25 % 0.51 pp more efficient
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 425 Wp 415 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA425-27V-MHD
14,260 kWh
ODA415-27V-MHD
13,924 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA425-27V-MHD ODA415-27V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 425 W 415 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 407 W 397 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 388 W 379 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 370 W 361 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA425-27V-MHD ODA415-27V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 425 Wp 415 Wp +10 W for ODA425-27V-MHD
Module efficiency 21.76 % 21.25 % +0.51 pp for ODA425-27V-MHD
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for ODA425-27V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 38.30 V 37.92 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.70 V 31.32 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.15 A 13.99 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.41 A 13.25 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.7 kg 24.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.1 kg/kWp 59.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,285 vs #8,904
ODA425-27V-MHD leads by 1,619 places
Power density
#7,172 vs #8,791
ODA425-27V-MHD leads by 1,619 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,567 vs #12,186
ODA425-27V-MHD leads by 619 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,013 vs #10,567
ODA425-27V-MHD leads by 554 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA440-27V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA430-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD has higher module efficiency (21.76% vs 21.25%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD has a module efficiency of 21.76%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD is 21.25%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.