AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
VS
The verdict
ODA730-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.25 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ODA415-27V-MHD
ODA730-33V-MHD
Difference
Module efficiency
21.25 %
23.50 %
2.25 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.223 %/°C
0.067 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
415 Wp
730 Wp
315 W more power
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
22.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight
24.7 kg
38.5 kg
13.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
59.5 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
6.8 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
37.92 V
49.54 V
11.62 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.99 A
17.79 A
3.80 A apart
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
0.07 %/yr slower
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Voltage at max power
31.32 V
44.05 V
12.73 V apart
Current at max power
13.25 A
16.62 A
3.37 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ODA415-27V-MHD
13,924 kWh
ODA730-33V-MHD
24,640 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,716 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ODA415-27V-MHD
ODA730-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
415 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
397 W
706 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
379 W
681 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
361 W
657 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ODA415-27V-MHD
ODA730-33V-MHD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
415 Wp
730 Wp
+315 W for ODA730-33V-MHD
Module efficiency
21.25 %
23.50 %
+2.25 pp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+22.5 Wp/m² for ODA730-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage
37.92 V
49.54 V
11.62 V apart
Voltage at max power
31.32 V
44.05 V
12.73 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.99 A
17.79 A
3.80 A apart
Current at max power
13.25 A
16.62 A
3.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.223 %/°C
+0.067 %/°C for ODA730-33V-MHD
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
24.7 kg
38.5 kg
-13.8 kg for ODA415-27V-MHD
Weight per kWp
59.5 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-6.8 kg/kWp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
-0.07 %/yr for ODA730-33V-MHD
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,904
vs
#716
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 8,188 places
Power density
#8,791
vs
#800
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 7,991 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#1
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 2,164 places
Weight
#12,186
vs
#6,396
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 5,790 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,567
vs
#208
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 10,359 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA440-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA430-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 21.25%); AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.223%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD has a module efficiency of 21.25%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.