Skip to main content
ODA410-27V-MHD vs ODA420-27V-MHD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA410-27V-MHD
410 Wp 21.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA420-27V-MHD
420 Wp 21.51 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

ODA420-27V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA410-27V-MHD ODA420-27V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 21.00 % 21.51 % 0.51 pp more efficient
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 215.1 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 410 Wp 420 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA410-27V-MHD
13,756 kWh
ODA420-27V-MHD
14,092 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA410-27V-MHD ODA420-27V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 410 W 420 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 392 W 402 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 374 W 383 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 356 W 365 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA410-27V-MHD ODA420-27V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 410 Wp 420 Wp +10 W for ODA420-27V-MHD
Module efficiency 21.00 % 21.51 % +0.51 pp for ODA420-27V-MHD
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 215.1 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for ODA420-27V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 37.73 V 38.11 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.13 V 31.51 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.91 A 14.07 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.17 A 13.33 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.7 kg 24.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 60.2 kg/kWp 58.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#9,758 vs #7,894
ODA420-27V-MHD leads by 1,864 places
Power density
#9,772 vs #7,882
ODA420-27V-MHD leads by 1,890 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,408 vs #11,908
ODA420-27V-MHD leads by 500 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,862 vs #10,282
ODA420-27V-MHD leads by 580 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA440-27V-MHD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA435-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA430-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA425-27V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA415-27V-MHD
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD has higher module efficiency (21.51% vs 21.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD has a module efficiency of 21.00%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD is 21.51%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD uses TOPCon cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA420-27V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.