Skip to main content
595 vs 570 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570

Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595
CHSM72N-HC-595
595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570
CHSM72N-HC-570
570 Wp 22.10 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

595 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 595 570 Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.10 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 595 Wp 570 Wp 25 W more power
Short-circuit current 14.60 A 14.10 A 0.50 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
595
19,963 kWh
570
19,125 kWh
Lifetime gap
838 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 595 570
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 570 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 569 W 545 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 543 W 520 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 517 W 496 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 595 570 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 570 Wp +25 W for 595
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.10 % +0.90 pp for 595
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for 595
Open-circuit voltage 51.60 V 50.85 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.00 V 42.38 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.60 A 14.10 A 0.50 A apart
Current at max power 13.84 A 13.45 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 26.9 kg 26.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 45.2 kg/kWp 47.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #6,012
595 leads by 4,093 places
Power density
#1,758 vs #6,058
595 leads by 4,300 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#645 vs #1,577
595 leads by 932 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,239 vs #5,137
595 leads by 1,898 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-590
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 or Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570 is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 use vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 35 Astronergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.