Skip to main content
BH 645W vs BH-650 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650

Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W
645 Wp 23.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650
CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650
650 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

BH-650 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter BH 645W BH-650 Difference
Module efficiency 23.10 % 23.30 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
BH 645W
21,641 kWh
BH-650
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BH 645W BH-650
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 650 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 617 W 622 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 589 W 593 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 561 W 565 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BH 645W BH-650 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 645 Wp 650 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.10 % 23.30 % +0.20 pp for BH-650
Power density 230.7 Wp/m² 232.5 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 57.08 V 57.01 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 48.03 V 47.12 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.20 A 14.51 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.43 A 13.80 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.795 m² 2.795 m² Same
Weight 34.7 kg 34.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 53.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 156 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,570 vs #1,017
BH-650 leads by 553 places
Power density
#1,654 vs #1,222
BH-650 leads by 432 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,876 vs #7,283
BH-650 leads by 593 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,496 vs #1,318
BH-650 leads by 178 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 650W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-645W
One difference: voltage at max power
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 640W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-640W
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 635W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W or Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W and Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645 W has a module efficiency of 23.10%, while Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W use vs Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645 W uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W and Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650?
Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645 W has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645W and Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH 645 W and Astronergy CHSM78N(DG)/F-BH-650 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.