Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
VS
The verdict
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Difference
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.80 %
1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power
720 Wp
670 Wp
50 W more power
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
16.3 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.0 kg
32.0 kg
6.0 kg lighter
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
5.0 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
18.58 A
16.87 A
1.71 A apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Current at max power
17.64 A
16.09 A
1.55 A apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
24,157 kWh
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,502 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
670 Wp
+50 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.80 %
+1.60 pp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+16.3 Wp/m² for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Open-circuit voltage
49.17 V
49.58 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.81 V
41.65 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.58 A
16.87 A
1.71 A apart
Current at max power
17.64 A
16.09 A
1.55 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
32.0 kg
-6.0 kg for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
-5.0 kg/kWp for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,306
vs
#12
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads by 1,294 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#14
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads by 1,333 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#6,459
vs
#1,884
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads by 4,575 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#339
vs
#295
CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 leads by 44 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 or Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.20%); Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 use vs Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720 and Astronergy CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

