Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455
VS
The verdict
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 5 differencesHow alike are they
14
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
5 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455
Difference
Module efficiency
23.80 %
22.80 %
1.00 pp more efficient
Power density
237.7 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
10.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
475 Wp
455 Wp
20 W more power
Weight per kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
15.43 A
14.85 A
0.58 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
15,937 kWh
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
455 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
454 W
435 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
434 W
415 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
413 W
396 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
455 Wp
+20 W for CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
Module efficiency
23.80 %
22.80 %
+1.00 pp for CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
Power density
237.7 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
+10.0 Wp/m² for CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
Open-circuit voltage
36.95 V
36.75 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
30.78 V
30.65 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.15 A
15.71 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.43 A
14.85 A
0.58 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.5 kg
24.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
96
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#433
vs
#2,714
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 leads by 2,281 places
Power density
#467
vs
#2,888
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 leads by 2,421 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,954
vs
#7,897
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 leads by 2,943 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,891
vs
#5,669
CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 leads by 1,778 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-470
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-470
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-465
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-465
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 or Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 and Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455 is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 use vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 and Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 and Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)/F-BH-475 and Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-455 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

