Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W
VS
The verdict
7M144N-HC-590 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.07 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
7M144N-HC-590
8M132-HC-645W
Difference
Module efficiency
22.83 %
20.76 %
2.07 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
590 Wp
645 Wp
55 W more power
Power density
228.3 Wp/m²
207.6 Wp/m²
20.7 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
0.20 %/yr slower
Weight
27.5 kg
34.0 kg
6.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
46.6 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
51.60 V
45.30 V
6.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.34 A
18.31 A
3.97 A apart
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power
43.40 V
37.50 V
5.90 V apart
Current at max power
13.59 A
17.20 A
3.61 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2279x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
7M144N-HC-590
19,796 kWh
8M132-HC-645W
20,619 kWh
Lifetime gap
823 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
7M144N-HC-590
8M132-HC-645W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
590 W
645 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
563 W
612 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
537 W
579 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
510 W
546 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
7M144N-HC-590
8M132-HC-645W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
590 Wp
645 Wp
+55 W for 8M132-HC-645W
Module efficiency
22.83 %
20.76 %
+2.07 pp for 7M144N-HC-590
Power density
228.3 Wp/m²
207.6 Wp/m²
+20.7 Wp/m² for 7M144N-HC-590
Open-circuit voltage
51.60 V
45.30 V
6.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.40 V
37.50 V
5.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.34 A
18.31 A
3.97 A apart
Current at max power
13.59 A
17.20 A
3.61 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for 7M144N-HC-590
Mechanical
Dimensions
2279x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
27.5 kg
34.0 kg
-6.5 kg for 7M144N-HC-590
Weight per kWp
46.6 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-6.1 kg/kWp for 7M144N-HC-590
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
20 yrs
20 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
-0.20 %/yr for 7M144N-HC-590
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,738
vs
#10,690
7M144N-HC-590 leads by 7,952 places
Power density
#2,786
vs
#10,638
7M144N-HC-590 leads by 7,852 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#8,846
7M144N-HC-590 leads by 2,694 places
Weight
#1,250
vs
#6,416
7M144N-HC-590 leads by 5,166 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,157
vs
#2,596
7M144N-HC-590 leads by 439 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-585
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 or Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
According to our database: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 20.76%); Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 and Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 has a module efficiency of 22.83%, while Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W is 20.76%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 use vs Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 uses TOPCon cells; Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 and Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645W?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590 has a 30 years power warranty; Amerisolar AS-8M132-HC-645 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 3 Amerisolar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.