Skip to main content
565 vs 560 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560

Amerisolar
AS-7M144N-HC-565
565 Wp 21.86 % TOPCon
VS
Amerisolar
AS-7M144N-HC-560
560 Wp 21.67 % TOPCon
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
565
18,957 kWh
560
18,789 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 565 560
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 540 W 535 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 514 W 510 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 489 W 484 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 565 560 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 560 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.86 % 21.67 % Effectively the same
Power density 218.6 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.60 V 50.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 42.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.09 A 14.04 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.28 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.584 m² 2.584 m² Same
Weight 27.5 kg 27.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.7 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,025 vs #7,652
565 leads by 627 places
Power density
#6,984 vs #7,602
565 leads by 618 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,411 vs #2,754
565 leads by 343 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,063 vs #4,435
565 leads by 372 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-570
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 or Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560?
According to our database: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has higher module efficiency (21.86% vs 21.67%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 and Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has a module efficiency of 21.86%, while Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 is 21.67%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 use vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 uses TOPCon cells; Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 and Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has a 30 years power warranty; Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 3 Amerisolar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.