Skip to main content
7M144N-HC-565 vs 7M144-HC-550 10 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550

Amerisolar
AS-7M144N-HC-565
565 Wp 21.86 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Amerisolar
AS-7M144-HC-550
550 Wp 21.28 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

7M144N-HC-565 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.060 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
10 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 18 parameters
Parameter 7M144N-HC-565 7M144-HC-550 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.360 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 21.86 % 21.28 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 218.6 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp 48.7 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Rated power 565 Wp 550 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Weight 27.5 kg 29.0 kg 1.5 kg lighter
Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
7M144N-HC-565
18,957 kWh
7M144-HC-550
18,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
800 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 7M144N-HC-565 7M144-HC-550
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.6% of rated power 540 W 520 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.2% of rated power 514 W 491 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.8% of rated power 489 W 461 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 7M144N-HC-565 7M144-HC-550 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 550 Wp +15 W for 7M144N-HC-565
Module efficiency 21.86 % 21.28 % +0.58 pp for 7M144N-HC-565
Power density 218.6 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for 7M144N-HC-565
Open-circuit voltage 50.60 V 50.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 41.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.09 A 13.94 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.16 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.360 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for 7M144N-HC-565
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.584 m² 2.584 m² Same
Weight 27.5 kg 29.0 kg -1.5 kg for 7M144N-HC-565
Weight per kWp 48.7 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -4.1 kg/kWp for 7M144N-HC-565
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Amerisolar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,025 vs #8,863
7M144N-HC-565 leads by 1,838 places
Power density
#6,984 vs #8,709
7M144N-HC-565 leads by 1,725 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #12,425
7M144N-HC-565 leads by 6,273 places
Weight
#2,411 vs #6,427
7M144N-HC-565 leads by 4,016 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,063 vs #5,288
7M144N-HC-565 leads by 1,225 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-590
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-570
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Amerisolar
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 vs Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-560
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 or Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
According to our database: Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has higher module efficiency (21.86% vs 21.28%); Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 and Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has a module efficiency of 21.86%, while Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 is 21.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 use vs Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 uses TOPCon cells; Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 and Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550?
Amerisolar AS-7M144N-HC-565 has a 30 years power warranty; Amerisolar AS-7M144-HC-550 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 3 Amerisolar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.