Skip to main content
BF10-545W-DG vs MF26-450W 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W

Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG
Aptos Solar
DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG
545 Wp 21.09 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Aptos Solar
DNA-144-MF26-450W
450 Wp 20.21 % PERC
The verdict

BF10-545W-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.88 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter BF10-545W-DG MF26-450W Difference
Module efficiency 21.09 % 20.21 % 0.88 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.335 %/°C -0.380 %/°C 0.045 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 545 Wp 450 Wp 95 W more power
Weight 32.3 kg 24.1 kg 8.2 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 59.3 kg/kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 11.33 A 2.59 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.177 m² 0.407 m² apart
Power density 211.0 Wp/m² 206.7 Wp/m² 4.2 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 12.38 A 10.74 A 1.64 A apart
Voltage at max power 44.00 V 41.00 V 3.00 V apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2095x1039x40 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2095x1039x40 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BF10-545W-DG
17,697 kWh
MF26-450W
14,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,089 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BF10-545W-DG MF26-450W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 545 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.3% of rated power 518 W 424 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.6% of rated power 490 W 399 W
Hot roof 70 °C 82.9% of rated power 463 W 373 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BF10-545W-DG MF26-450W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 545 Wp 450 Wp +95 W for BF10-545W-DG
Module efficiency 21.09 % 20.21 % +0.88 pp for BF10-545W-DG
Power density 211.0 Wp/m² 206.7 Wp/m² +4.2 Wp/m² for BF10-545W-DG
Open-circuit voltage 49.65 V 49.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.00 V 41.00 V 3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 11.33 A 2.59 A apart
Current at max power 12.38 A 10.74 A 1.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.335 %/°C -0.380 %/°C +0.045 %/°C for BF10-545W-DG
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2095x1039x40 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2095x1039x40 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.177 m² 0.407 m² apart
Weight 32.3 kg 24.1 kg -8.2 kg for MF26-450W
Weight per kWp 59.3 kg/kWp 53.6 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for MF26-450W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.54 %/yr 0.54 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#9,519 vs #11,945
BF10-545W-DG leads by 2,426 places
Power density
#9,312 vs #10,918
BF10-545W-DG leads by 1,606 places
Heat behaviour
#8,753 vs #13,397
BF10-545W-DG leads by 4,644 places
Weight
#12,093 vs #7,554
MF26-450W leads by 4,539 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,650 vs #7,964
BF10-545W-DG leads by 4,314 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-540W-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-445W
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-460W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-MF10-455W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG or Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W?
According to our database: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has higher module efficiency (21.09% vs 20.21%); Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.335%/°C vs -0.380%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has a module efficiency of 21.09%, while Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450 W is 20.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG use vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG uses PERC cells; Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG and Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450W bifacial panels?
Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-545 W-DG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Aptos Solar DNA-144-MF26-450 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Aptos Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.