Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG
VS
The verdict
144-BF10-550W-DG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.28 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
120-BF26-365W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Difference
Module efficiency
20.01 %
21.29 %
1.28 pp more efficient
Rated power
365 Wp
550 Wp
185 W more power
Power density
200.1 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
12.9 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.335 %/°C
0.025 %/°C better in heat
Weight
19.5 kg
32.3 kg
12.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.10 V
49.80 V
8.70 V apart
Short-circuit current
11.19 A
13.99 A
2.80 A apart
Module area
1.824 m²
2.583 m²
0.759 m² apart
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
5.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
44.15 V
9.85 V apart
Cell count
120
144
24 cells apart
Current at max power
10.66 A
12.45 A
1.79 A apart
Dimensions
1756x1039x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1756x1039x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
120-BF26-365W
11,848 kWh
144-BF10-550W-DG
17,859 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,011 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
120-BF26-365W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
365 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.6% of rated power
345 W
522 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.2% of rated power
326 W
495 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.8% of rated power
306 W
467 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
120-BF26-365W
144-BF10-550W-DG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
365 Wp
550 Wp
+185 W for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Module efficiency
20.01 %
21.29 %
+1.28 pp for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Power density
200.1 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
+12.9 Wp/m² for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Open-circuit voltage
41.10 V
49.80 V
8.70 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.30 V
44.15 V
9.85 V apart
Short-circuit current
11.19 A
13.99 A
2.80 A apart
Current at max power
10.66 A
12.45 A
1.79 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.335 %/°C
+0.025 %/°C for 144-BF10-550W-DG
Mechanical
Dimensions
1756x1039x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1756x1039x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
1.824 m²
2.583 m²
0.759 m² apart
Weight
19.5 kg
32.3 kg
-12.8 kg for 120-BF26-365W
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
-5.3 kg/kWp for 120-BF26-365W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.54 %/yr
0.54 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
144
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,197
vs
#8,708
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 3,489 places
Power density
#12,214
vs
#8,497
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 3,717 places
Heat behaviour
#12,345
vs
#8,753
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 3,592 places
Weight
#7,348
vs
#11,864
120-BF26-365W leads by 4,516 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,495
vs
#3,247
144-BF10-550W-DG leads by 7,248 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-455W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-450W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-445W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-360W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W or Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
According to our database: Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.01%); Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.335%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365 W has a module efficiency of 20.01%, while Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W use vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365 W uses PERC cells; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365 W has a 30 years power warranty; Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG bifacial panels?
Both Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365 W and Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550 W-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Aptos Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

