Skip to main content
BF10-460W vs BF26-370W 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W

Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W
Aptos Solar
DNA-120-BF10-460W
460 Wp 21.26 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Aptos Solar
DNA-120-BF26-370W
370 Wp 20.28 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

BF10-460W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.98 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter BF10-460W BF26-370W Difference
Module efficiency 21.26 % 20.28 % 0.98 pp more efficient
Rated power 460 Wp 370 Wp 90 W more power
Power density 212.6 Wp/m² 202.8 Wp/m² 9.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 22.8 kg 19.5 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.01 A 11.26 A 2.75 A apart
Module area 2.164 m² 1.824 m² 0.339 m² apart
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.360 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 12.99 A 10.72 A 2.27 A apart
Dimensions 1908x1134x35 mm 1756x1039x35 mm 1908x1134x35 mm vs 1756x1039x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BF10-460W
14,932 kWh
BF26-370W
12,011 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,921 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BF10-460W BF26-370W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 370 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.6% of rated power 436 W 350 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.2% of rated power 412 W 330 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.8% of rated power 388 W 310 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BF10-460W BF26-370W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 370 Wp +90 W for BF10-460W
Module efficiency 21.26 % 20.28 % +0.98 pp for BF10-460W
Power density 212.6 Wp/m² 202.8 Wp/m² +9.8 Wp/m² for BF10-460W
Open-circuit voltage 41.18 V 41.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 35.40 V 34.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.01 A 11.26 A 2.75 A apart
Current at max power 12.99 A 10.72 A 2.27 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.360 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for BF10-460W
Mechanical
Dimensions 1908x1134x35 mm 1756x1039x35 mm 1908x1134x35 mm vs 1756x1039x35 mm
Module area 2.164 m² 1.824 m² 0.339 m² apart
Weight 22.8 kg 19.5 kg -3.3 kg for BF26-370W
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -3.2 kg/kWp for BF10-460W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.54 %/yr 0.54 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,894 vs #11,853
BF10-460W leads by 2,959 places
Power density
#8,778 vs #11,807
BF10-460W leads by 3,029 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #12,345
BF10-460W leads by 1,926 places
Weight
#3,041 vs #6,344
BF10-460W leads by 3,303 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,187 vs #10,205
BF10-460W leads by 4,018 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-455W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-450W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-445W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-365W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-360W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Aptos Solar
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W vs Aptos Solar DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W or Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W?
According to our database: Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W has higher module efficiency (21.26% vs 20.28%); Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.350%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W and Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W has a module efficiency of 21.26%, while Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370 W is 20.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W use vs Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W uses PERC cells; Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W and Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W?
Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W has a 30 years power warranty; Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460W and Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370W bifacial panels?
Both Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF10-460 W and Aptos Solar DNA-120-BF26-370 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Aptos Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.