AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
VS
The verdict
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Difference
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight
24.5 kg
21.6 kg
2.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
47.0 kg/kWp
5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.12 V
36.92 V
4.20 V apart
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
14.29 A
15.75 A
1.46 A apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
HJT
Back Contact vs HJT
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
34.68 V
31.05 V
3.63 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Current at max power
13.41 A
14.82 A
1.41 A apart
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
15,723 kWh
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
15,674 kWh
Lifetime gap
49 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
460 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
447 W
443 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
429 W
427 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
411 W
410 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
460 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
+0.30 pp for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db
Open-circuit voltage
41.12 V
36.92 V
4.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.68 V
31.05 V
3.63 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.29 A
15.75 A
1.46 A apart
Current at max power
13.41 A
14.82 A
1.41 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.992 m²
1.998 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
24.5 kg
21.6 kg
-2.9 kg for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
47.0 kg/kWp
-5.7 kg/kWp for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
HJT
Back Contact vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,057
vs
#1,970
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 913 places
Power density
#1,028
vs
#1,927
AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 899 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#13
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 502 places
Weight
#6,371
vs
#1,421
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 4,950 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,834
vs
#4,242
HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) leads by 592 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MAH54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H455LE-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H445LE-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H440LE-FB(ZB)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db or Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.00%); Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?
AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db use vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?
AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db uses Back Contact cells; Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)?
AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a 30 years power warranty; Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) bifacial panels?
Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 153 AIKO offers · See 28 Hyundai offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.