Skip to main content
610-MAH72Mw vs 620-MAH72Mw 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw

AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw
AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw
610 Wp 23.60 % Back Contact
VS
AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw
AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw
620 Wp 24.00 % Back Contact
The verdict

620-MAH72Mw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 610-MAH72Mw 620-MAH72Mw Difference
Module efficiency 23.60 % 24.00 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 240.0 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 610 Wp 620 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
610-MAH72Mw
20,626 kWh
620-MAH72Mw
20,964 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 610-MAH72Mw 620-MAH72Mw
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 583 W 593 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 557 W 566 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 530 W 539 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 610-MAH72Mw 620-MAH72Mw Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 620 Wp +10 W for 620-MAH72Mw
Module efficiency 23.60 % 24.00 % +0.40 pp for 620-MAH72Mw
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 240.0 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 620-MAH72Mw
Open-circuit voltage 53.49 V 53.69 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 45.01 V 45.21 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.04 A 14.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.56 A 13.72 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 28.2 kg 28.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 46.2 kg/kWp 45.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#627 vs #303
620-MAH72Mw leads by 324 places
Power density
#623 vs #332
620-MAH72Mw leads by 291 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,076 vs #749
620-MAH72Mw leads by 327 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,765 vs #1,385
620-MAH72Mw leads by 380 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-615-MAH72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-605-MAH72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw or AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw has higher module efficiency (24.00% vs 23.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw is 24.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A-610-MAH72Mw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A-620-MAH72Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.