AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw
VS
The verdict
G650-MCH72Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
G650-MCH72Mw
A-600-MAH72Mw
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.20 %
0.90 pp more efficient
Rated power
650 Wp
600 Wp
50 W more power
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
232.3 Wp/m²
8.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight
31.5 kg
28.2 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Short-circuit current
15.12 A
13.92 A
1.20 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
54.40 V
53.28 V
1.12 V apart
Current at max power
14.42 A
13.40 A
1.02 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
G650-MCH72Mw
21,978 kWh
A-600-MAH72Mw
20,288 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,690 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
G650-MCH72Mw
A-600-MAH72Mw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
650 W
600 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
625 W
574 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
599 W
548 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
574 W
522 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
G650-MCH72Mw
A-600-MAH72Mw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
650 Wp
600 Wp
+50 W for G650-MCH72Mw
Module efficiency
24.10 %
23.20 %
+0.90 pp for G650-MCH72Mw
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
232.3 Wp/m²
+8.4 Wp/m² for G650-MCH72Mw
Open-circuit voltage
54.40 V
53.28 V
1.12 V apart
Voltage at max power
45.10 V
44.81 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.12 A
13.92 A
1.20 A apart
Current at max power
14.42 A
13.40 A
1.02 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for G650-MCH72Mw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
28.2 kg
-3.3 kg for A-600-MAH72Mw
Weight per kWp
48.5 kg/kWp
47.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#241
vs
#1,349
G650-MCH72Mw leads by 1,108 places
Power density
#255
vs
#1,295
G650-MCH72Mw leads by 1,040 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#2,220
G650-MCH72Mw leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#2,301
vs
#1,450
A-600-MAH72Mw leads by 851 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#880
vs
#2,331
G650-MCH72Mw leads by 1,451 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G660-MCH72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G655-MCH72Mw
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G645-MCH72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G640-MCH72Mw
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G635-MCH72Mw
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-G630-MCH72Mw
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw or AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.20%); AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-G650-MCH72Mw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A-600-MAH72Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.