AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO M550M-144
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.50 pp more efficient. 1 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
1
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
17 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
M550M-144
Difference
Module efficiency
24.80 %
21.30 %
3.50 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.360 %/°C
0.100 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
795 Wp
550 Wp
245 W more power
Power density
247.5 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
34.7 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
39.8 kg
29.0 kg
10.8 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
59.22 V
49.90 V
9.32 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.99 A
13.80 A
3.19 A apart
Module area
3.212 m²
2.584 m²
0.628 m² apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Voltage at max power
49.27 V
42.10 V
7.17 V apart
Current at max power
16.14 A
13.07 A
3.07 A apart
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
50.1 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
26,674 kWh
M550M-144
18,454 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,220 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
M550M-144
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
795 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.6% of rated power
764 W
520 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.2% of rated power
733 W
491 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.8% of rated power
702 W
461 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
M550M-144
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
795 Wp
550 Wp
+245 W for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency
24.80 %
21.30 %
+3.50 pp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Power density
247.5 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
+34.7 Wp/m² for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Open-circuit voltage
59.22 V
49.90 V
9.32 V apart
Voltage at max power
49.27 V
42.10 V
7.17 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.99 A
13.80 A
3.19 A apart
Current at max power
16.14 A
13.07 A
3.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.360 %/°C
+0.100 %/°C for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2465x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.212 m²
2.584 m²
0.628 m² apart
Weight
39.8 kg
29.0 kg
-10.8 kg for M550M-144
Weight per kWp
50.1 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-2.7 kg/kWp for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
Annual degradation
-
0.55 %/yr
Not published by AIKO
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#13
vs
#8,585
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 8,572 places
Power density
#42
vs
#8,709
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 8,667 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#12,425
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 11,910 places
Weight
#3,602
vs
#6,427
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 2,825 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#3
vs
#8,140
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw leads by 8,137 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw or AIKO M550M-144?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 21.30%); AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO M550M-144?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while AIKO M550M-144 is 21.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw use vs AIKO M550M-144?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO M550M-144 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO M550M-144?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO M550M-144 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO M550M-144 bifacial panels?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO M550M-144 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 131 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
