Skip to main content
A795-GRH78Dw vs A805-GRH78Dw 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw

AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
795 Wp 24.80 % Back Contact Bifacial Incomplete
VS
AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
805 Wp 25.10 % Back Contact Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

A805-GRH78Dw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter A795-GRH78Dw A805-GRH78Dw Difference
Module efficiency 24.80 % 25.10 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 247.5 Wp/m² 250.6 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 795 Wp 805 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A795-GRH78Dw
26,674 kWh
A805-GRH78Dw
27,009 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario A795-GRH78Dw A805-GRH78Dw
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 795 W 805 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 764 W 774 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 733 W 742 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 702 W 711 W
03

Full specification

Parameter A795-GRH78Dw A805-GRH78Dw Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 795 Wp 805 Wp +10 W for A805-GRH78Dw
Module efficiency 24.80 % 25.10 % +0.30 pp for A805-GRH78Dw
Power density 247.5 Wp/m² 250.6 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for A805-GRH78Dw
Open-circuit voltage 59.22 V 59.42 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 49.27 V 49.46 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.99 A 17.13 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.14 A 16.28 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1303x33 mm 2465x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.212 m² 3.212 m² Same
Weight 39.8 kg 39.8 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.1 kg/kWp 49.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 156 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #3
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 9 places
Power density
#38 vs #3
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 35 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,585 vs #2,977
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 608 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3 vs #1
A805-GRH78Dw leads by 2 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw or AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has higher module efficiency (25.10% vs 24.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw is 25.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw use vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw bifacial panels?
Both AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 180 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.