Skip to main content
A675-MDE72Mw vs A660-MDE72Mw 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw

AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw
AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw
675 Wp 25.00 % Back Contact
VS
AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw
AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw
660 Wp 24.40 % Back Contact
The verdict

A675-MDE72Mw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter A675-MDE72Mw A660-MDE72Mw Difference
Module efficiency 25.00 % 24.40 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Power density 249.9 Wp/m² 244.3 Wp/m² 5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 675 Wp 660 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A675-MDE72Mw
22,824 kWh
A660-MDE72Mw
22,317 kWh
Lifetime gap
507 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario A675-MDE72Mw A660-MDE72Mw
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 675 W 660 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 649 W 634 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 622 W 609 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 596 W 583 W
03

Full specification

Parameter A675-MDE72Mw A660-MDE72Mw Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 675 Wp 660 Wp +15 W for A675-MDE72Mw
Module efficiency 25.00 % 24.40 % +0.60 pp for A675-MDE72Mw
Power density 249.9 Wp/m² 244.3 Wp/m² +5.6 Wp/m² for A675-MDE72Mw
Open-circuit voltage 54.90 V 54.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 45.60 V 45.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.42 A 15.24 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.81 A 14.57 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 29.0 kg 29.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 43.0 kg/kWp 43.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4 vs #99
A675-MDE72Mw leads by 95 places
Power density
#5 vs #88
A675-MDE72Mw leads by 83 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#258 vs #363
A675-MDE72Mw leads by 105 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#215 vs #511
A675-MDE72Mw leads by 296 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A680-MDE72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A670-MDE72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw or AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw has higher module efficiency (25.00% vs 24.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw has a module efficiency of 25.00%, while AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw is 24.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw and AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 180 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.