Skip to main content
A675-MAE78Dw vs A695-MAE78Dw 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw

AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw
AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw
675 Wp 24.10 % Back Contact
VS
AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw
AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw
695 Wp 24.90 % Back Contact
The verdict

A695-MAE78Dw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter A675-MAE78Dw A695-MAE78Dw Difference
Module efficiency 24.10 % 24.90 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Power density 241.5 Wp/m² 248.6 Wp/m² 7.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 675 Wp 695 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A675-MAE78Dw
22,824 kWh
A695-MAE78Dw
23,500 kWh
Lifetime gap
676 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario A675-MAE78Dw A695-MAE78Dw
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 675 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 649 W 668 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 622 W 641 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 596 W 614 W
03

Full specification

Parameter A675-MAE78Dw A695-MAE78Dw Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 675 Wp 695 Wp +20 W for A695-MAE78Dw
Module efficiency 24.10 % 24.90 % +0.80 pp for A695-MAE78Dw
Power density 241.5 Wp/m² 248.6 Wp/m² +7.2 Wp/m² for A695-MAE78Dw
Open-circuit voltage 58.98 V 59.22 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 48.85 V 49.09 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.49 A 14.77 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.82 A 14.16 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.795 m² 2.795 m² Same
Weight 34.5 kg 34.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 49.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 156 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#219 vs #10
A695-MAE78Dw leads by 209 places
Power density
#216 vs #11
A695-MAE78Dw leads by 205 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,436 vs #3,186
A695-MAE78Dw leads by 1,250 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#494 vs #159
A695-MAE78Dw leads by 335 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A690-MAE78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A685-MAE78Dw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A680-MAE78Dw
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw or AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw has higher module efficiency (24.90% vs 24.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw is 24.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw use vs AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw and AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw?
AIKO AIKO-A675-MAE78Dw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.