AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.20 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
16 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
TSM-DEG21C.20-665
Difference
Module efficiency
24.60 %
21.40 %
3.20 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
214.1 Wp/m²
32.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
29.0 kg
38.3 kg
9.3 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
43.6 kg/kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
14.0 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
54.70 V
46.10 V
8.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.30 A
18.50 A
3.20 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Voltage at max power
45.40 V
38.30 V
7.10 V apart
Current at max power
14.65 A
17.39 A
2.74 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
22,486 kWh
TSM-DEG21C.20-665
21,899 kWh
Lifetime gap
587 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
TSM-DEG21C.20-665
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
665 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
639 W
631 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
613 W
597 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
587 W
563 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
TSM-DEG21C.20-665
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
665 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
24.60 %
21.40 %
+3.20 pp for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
214.1 Wp/m²
+32.1 Wp/m² for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Open-circuit voltage
54.70 V
46.10 V
8.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
45.40 V
38.30 V
7.10 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.30 A
18.50 A
3.20 A apart
Current at max power
14.65 A
17.39 A
2.74 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
29.0 kg
38.3 kg
-9.3 kg for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Weight per kWp
43.6 kg/kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
-14.0 kg/kWp for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
PERC
Back Contact vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#51
vs
#8,323
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads by 8,272 places
Power density
#42
vs
#8,250
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads by 8,208 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#8,778
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads by 8,267 places
Weight
#315
vs
#11,303
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads by 10,988 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#390
vs
#2,833
AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw leads by 2,443 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A680-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A675-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A670-MDE72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A660-MDE72Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A655-MDE72Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw or Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw has higher module efficiency (24.60% vs 21.40%); AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw and Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665?
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw has a module efficiency of 24.60%, while Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw use vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665?
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw uses Back Contact cells; Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw and Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665?
AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw and Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A665-MDE72Mw is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 180 AIKO offers · See 248 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

