AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw
VS
The verdict
A475-MAH54Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
A475-MAH54Mw
A465-MAH54Mw
Difference
Module efficiency
23.80 %
23.30 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Power density
238.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
475 Wp
465 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A475-MAH54Mw
16,061 kWh
A465-MAH54Mw
15,723 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
A475-MAH54Mw
A465-MAH54Mw
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
456 W
447 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
438 W
429 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
419 W
411 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
A475-MAH54Mw
A465-MAH54Mw
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
465 Wp
+10 W for A475-MAH54Mw
Module efficiency
23.80 %
23.30 %
+0.50 pp for A475-MAH54Mw
Power density
238.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for A475-MAH54Mw
Open-circuit voltage
41.24 V
41.12 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
34.80 V
34.68 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.35 A
14.29 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.66 A
13.41 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
1757x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.992 m²
1.992 m²
Same
Weight
21.5 kg
21.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
45.3 kg/kWp
46.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#433
vs
#1,017
A475-MAH54Mw leads by 584 places
Power density
#417
vs
#989
A475-MAH54Mw leads by 572 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#669
vs
#1,079
A475-MAH54Mw leads by 410 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,753
vs
#4,646
A475-MAH54Mw leads by 893 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MAH54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A455-MAH54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A450-MAH54Mw
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw or AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw use vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw?
AIKO AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 180 AIKO offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.