Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-730W vs MD-120BS-460 4 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar MD-120BS-460

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
CME-132BDS-730W
730 Wp 23.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AE Solar MD-120BS-460
MD-120BS-460
460 Wp 21.35 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

CME-132BDS-730W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.18 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
4 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

14 of 18 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-730W MD-120BS-460 Difference
Module efficiency 23.53 % 21.35 % 2.18 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 730 Wp 460 Wp 270 W more power
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 213.5 Wp/m² 21.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 37.0 kg 22.5 kg 14.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 42.60 V 6.90 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 13.67 A 4.82 A apart
Module area 3.103 m² 2.155 m² 0.948 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 35.60 V 6.10 V apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 12.92 A 4.59 A apart
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 1902x1133x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CME-132BDS-730W
24,493 kWh
MD-120BS-460
15,186 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,307 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-730W MD-120BS-460
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 698 W 436 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 666 W 412 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 635 W 388 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-730W MD-120BS-460 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 460 Wp +270 W for CME-132BDS-730W
Module efficiency 23.53 % 21.35 % +2.18 pp for CME-132BDS-730W
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 213.5 Wp/m² +21.8 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-730W
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 42.60 V 6.90 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 35.60 V 6.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 13.67 A 4.82 A apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 12.92 A 4.59 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for CME-132BDS-730W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 1902x1133x30 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 2.155 m² 0.948 m² apart
Weight 37.0 kg 22.5 kg -14.5 kg for MD-120BS-460
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 48.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for MD-120BS-460
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#707 vs #8,528
CME-132BDS-730W leads by 7,821 places
Power density
#705 vs #8,487
CME-132BDS-730W leads by 7,782 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #10,489
CME-132BDS-730W leads by 8,269 places
Weight
#4,133 vs #2,595
MD-120BS-460 leads by 1,538 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#190 vs #6,117
CME-132BDS-730W leads by 5,927 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W or AE Solar MD-120BS-460?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 21.35%); AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar MD-120BS-460?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while AE Solar MD-120BS-460 is 21.35%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W use vs AE Solar MD-120BS-460?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar MD-120BS-460 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar MD-120BS-460?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar MD-120BS-460 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar MD-120BS-460 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W and AE Solar MD-120BS-460 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.