Skip to main content
132BDS-730W vs 132-725W 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
CME-132BDS-730W
730 Wp 23.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CME-132-725W
CME-132-725W
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

132-725W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 5.5 kg lighter. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 132BDS-730W 132-725W Difference
Weight 37.0 kg 31.5 kg 5.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 43.4 kg/kWp 7.2 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
132BDS-730W
24,493 kWh
132-725W
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 132BDS-730W 132-725W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 132BDS-730W 132-725W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 725 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.53 % 23.37 % Effectively the same
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 233.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 49.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 41.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 18.46 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.51 A 17.47 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 31.5 kg -5.5 kg for 132-725W
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 43.4 kg/kWp -7.2 kg/kWp for 132-725W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#707 vs #968
132BDS-730W leads by 261 places
Power density
#705 vs #961
132BDS-730W leads by 256 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,133 vs #299
132-725W leads by 3,834 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#190 vs #231
132BDS-730W leads by 41 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W vs AE Solar AE CME-132-720
7 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W or AE Solar CME-132-725W?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 23.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar CME-132-725W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while AE Solar CME-132-725 W is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W use vs AE Solar CME-132-725W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132-725 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar CME-132-725W?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132-725 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W and AE Solar CME-132-725W bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar CME-132-725 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.