Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-730 vs MS735N-HJTGB 11 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
CME-132BDS-730
730 Wp 23.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
MY Solar
MS735N-HJTGB
735 Wp 23.66 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MS735N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
11 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

7 of 18 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-730 MS735N-HJTGB Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Weight 37.0 kg 38.3 kg 1.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 51.20 V 1.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 17.88 A 0.61 A apart
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 43.13 V 1.43 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CME-132BDS-730
24,493 kWh
MS735N-HJTGB
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-730 MS735N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 709 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 682 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 656 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-730 MS735N-HJTGB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 735 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.53 % 23.66 % Effectively the same
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 51.20 V 1.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 43.13 V 1.43 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 17.88 A 0.61 A apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 17.06 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for MS735N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 3.106 m² Effectively the same
Weight 37.0 kg 38.3 kg -1.3 kg for CME-132BDS-730
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by MY Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#674 vs #602
MS735N-HJTGB leads by 72 places
Power density
#672 vs #582
MS735N-HJTGB leads by 90 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #13
MS735N-HJTGB leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#4,111 vs #5,576
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 1,465 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7 vs #5
MS735N-HJTGB leads by 2 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 or MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB?
According to our database: MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.53%); MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 use vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 uses TOPCon cells; MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a 30 years power warranty; MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare AE Solar and MY Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.