Skip to main content
725W vs 715 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
CME-132BDS-725W
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
CME-132BDS-715
715 Wp 23.04 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

4 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 725W 715 Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Module efficiency 23.37 % 23.04 % 0.33 pp more efficient
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 230.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
725W
24,325 kWh
715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 725W 715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 725W 715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp +10 W for 725W
Module efficiency 23.37 % 23.04 % +0.33 pp for 725W
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 230.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 725W
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 48.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 41.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.46 A 18.40 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for 715
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#930 vs #1,711
725W leads by 781 places
Power density
#923 vs #1,702
725W leads by 779 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,382 vs #5,113
725W leads by 731 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#249 vs #38
715 leads by 211 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
One difference: product warranty
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W or AE Solar CME-132BDS-715?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.04%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-715?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-715 is 23.04%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-715?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-715 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.