CME-132BDS-725W vs AE CMD-108BDE-435 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435

Q: Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 bifacial panels?

Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

CME-132BDS-725W

725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

AE CMD-108BDE-435

435 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

CME-132BDS-725W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.06 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences

How alike are they

6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters

Parameter CME-132BDS-725W AE CMD-108BDE-435 Difference

Module efficiency 23.37 % 22.31 % 1.06 pp more efficient

Rated power 725 Wp 435 Wp 290 W more power

Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² 10.6 Wp/m² higher

Weight 37.0 kg 23.5 kg 13.5 kg lighter

Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer

Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 38.66 V 10.64 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.46 A 14.06 A 4.40 A apart

Module area 3.103 m² 1.950 m² 1.153 m² apart

Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 3.0 kg/kWp lighter

Voltage at max power 41.50 V 32.84 V 8.66 V apart

Current at max power 17.47 A 13.25 A 4.22 A apart

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

CME-132BDS-725W

24,325 kWh

AE CMD-108BDE-435

14,595 kWh

Lifetime gap

9,730 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario CME-132BDS-725W AE CMD-108BDE-435

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 435 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 416 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 397 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 378 W

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-725W AE CMD-108BDE-435 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 725 Wp 435 Wp +290 W for CME-132BDS-725W

Module efficiency 23.37 % 22.31 % +1.06 pp for CME-132BDS-725W

Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² +10.6 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725W

Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 38.66 V 10.64 V apart

Voltage at max power 41.50 V 32.84 V 8.66 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.46 A 14.06 A 4.40 A apart

Current at max power 17.47 A 13.25 A 4.22 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm

Module area 3.103 m² 1.950 m² 1.153 m² apart

Weight 37.0 kg 23.5 kg -13.5 kg for AE CMD-108BDE-435

Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp -3.0 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-725W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for AE CMD-108BDE-435

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#930 vs #5,082

CME-132BDS-725W leads by 4,152 places

Power density

#923 vs #5,070

CME-132BDS-725W leads by 4,147 places

Heat behaviour

#2,165 vs #2,165

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#4,382 vs #8,229

CME-132BDS-725W leads by 3,847 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#249 vs #5,914

CME-132BDS-725W leads by 5,665 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730

One difference: product warranty

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725

One difference: product warranty

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W

3 differences, the largest is weight

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720

4 differences, the largest is weight

Same series, other bin

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720

One difference: product warranty

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435?

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 bifacial panels?

Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDE-435 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.