Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-720 vs RCM-730-8DBNM 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM

AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
CME-132BDS-720
720 Wp 23.21 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
Recom
RCM-730-8DBNM
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

RCM-730-8DBNM leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.29 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-720 RCM-730-8DBNM Difference
Module efficiency 23.21 % 23.50 % 0.29 pp more efficient
Rated power 720 Wp 730 Wp 10 W more power
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132BDS-720
24,157 kWh
RCM-730-8DBNM
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-720 RCM-730-8DBNM
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 689 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 657 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 626 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-720 RCM-730-8DBNM Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 730 Wp +10 W for RCM-730-8DBNM
Module efficiency 23.21 % 23.50 % +0.29 pp for RCM-730-8DBNM
Power density 232.1 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 49.59 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 41.44 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 18.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.43 A 17.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 3.106 m² Effectively the same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.8 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,299 vs #716
RCM-730-8DBNM leads by 583 places
Power density
#1,339 vs #800
RCM-730-8DBNM leads by 539 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,775 vs #5,151
CME-132BDS-720 leads by 376 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#22 vs #8
RCM-730-8DBNM leads by 14 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 or Recom RCM-730-8DBNM?
According to our database: Recom RCM-730-8DBNM has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.21%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 and Recom RCM-730-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 has a module efficiency of 23.21%, while Recom RCM-730-8DBNM is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 use vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-730-8DBNM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 and Recom RCM-730-8DBNM?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-730-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 and Recom RCM-730-8DBNM bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 and Recom RCM-730-8DBNM are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare AE Solar and Recom as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers · See 3 Recom offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.