AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CMD-108-440
VS
The verdict
CME-132-725W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CME-132-725W
CMD-108-440
Difference
Module efficiency
23.37 %
22.57 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
725 Wp
440 Wp
285 W more power
Weight
31.5 kg
20.3 kg
11.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Power density
233.7 Wp/m²
225.7 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
38.66 V
10.64 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.46 A
14.30 A
4.16 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
1.950 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight per kWp
43.4 kg/kWp
46.1 kg/kWp
2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
32.84 V
8.66 V apart
Current at max power
17.47 A
13.40 A
4.07 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132-725W
24,325 kWh
CMD-108-440
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,562 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CME-132-725W
CMD-108-440
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
440 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
693 W
421 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
662 W
402 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
630 W
383 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CME-132-725W
CMD-108-440
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
440 Wp
+285 W for CME-132-725W
Module efficiency
23.37 %
22.57 %
+0.80 pp for CME-132-725W
Power density
233.7 Wp/m²
225.7 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for CME-132-725W
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
38.66 V
10.64 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
32.84 V
8.66 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.46 A
14.30 A
4.16 A apart
Current at max power
17.47 A
13.40 A
4.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
1.950 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
20.3 kg
-11.2 kg for CMD-108-440
Weight per kWp
43.4 kg/kWp
46.1 kg/kWp
-2.7 kg/kWp for CME-132-725W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for CMD-108-440
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#930
vs
#3,882
CME-132-725W leads by 2,952 places
Power density
#923
vs
#3,848
CME-132-725W leads by 2,925 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#299
vs
#1,011
CME-132-725W leads by 712 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#230
vs
#5,240
CME-132-725W leads by 5,010 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
4 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132-725W or AE Solar CMD-108-440?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 22.57%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar CMD-108-440?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar CMD-108-440 is 22.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132-725W use vs AE Solar CMD-108-440?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CMD-108-440 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar CMD-108-440?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CMD-108-440 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.