AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590
VS
The verdict
AE CMD-144BDS-590 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 155 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CMD-108BDS-435
AE CMD-144BDS-590
Difference
Rated power
435 Wp
590 Wp
155 W more power
Module efficiency
22.31 %
22.86 %
0.55 pp more efficient
Weight
23.5 kg
31.0 kg
7.5 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
38.46 V
52.24 V
13.78 V apart
Module area
1.950 m²
2.581 m²
0.631 m² apart
Power density
223.1 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
5.5 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
32.64 V
43.29 V
10.65 V apart
Cell count
108
144
36 cells apart
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMD-108BDS-435
14,595 kWh
AE CMD-144BDS-590
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,201 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CMD-108BDS-435
AE CMD-144BDS-590
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
435 W
590 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
416 W
564 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
397 W
539 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
378 W
513 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CMD-108BDS-435
AE CMD-144BDS-590
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
435 Wp
590 Wp
+155 W for AE CMD-144BDS-590
Module efficiency
22.31 %
22.86 %
+0.55 pp for AE CMD-144BDS-590
Power density
223.1 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
+5.5 Wp/m² for AE CMD-144BDS-590
Open-circuit voltage
38.46 V
52.24 V
13.78 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.64 V
43.29 V
10.65 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.23 A
14.54 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.33 A
13.63 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
Module area
1.950 m²
2.581 m²
0.631 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
31.0 kg
-7.5 kg for CMD-108BDS-435
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for AE CMD-144BDS-590
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
144
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,082
vs
#2,536
AE CMD-144BDS-590 leads by 2,546 places
Power density
#5,070
vs
#2,463
AE CMD-144BDS-590 leads by 2,607 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,229
vs
#6,152
AE CMD-144BDS-590 leads by 2,077 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,195
vs
#1,099
AE CMD-144BDS-590 leads by 8,096 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-580
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-575
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-570
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 or AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 has a module efficiency of 22.31%, while AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 use vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 and AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
