Skip to main content
CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE CMD-108BDS 435W 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W

AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425
CMD-108BDS-425
425 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W
AE CMD-108BDS 435W
435 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AE CMD-108BDS 435W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter CMD-108BDS-425 AE CMD-108BDS 435W Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.31 % 0.51 pp more efficient
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Power density 218.0 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 425 Wp 435 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMD-108BDS-425
14,260 kWh
AE CMD-108BDS 435W
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CMD-108BDS-425 AE CMD-108BDS 435W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 425 W 435 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 407 W 416 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 388 W 397 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 370 W 378 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CMD-108BDS-425 AE CMD-108BDS 435W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 425 Wp 435 Wp +10 W for AE CMD-108BDS 435W
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.31 % +0.51 pp for AE CMD-108BDS 435W
Power density 218.0 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for AE CMD-108BDS 435W
Open-circuit voltage 38.08 V 38.46 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.25 V 32.64 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.10 A 14.23 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.18 A 13.33 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 23.5 kg 23.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for AE CMD-108BDS 435W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #5,082
AE CMD-108BDS 435W leads by 1,940 places
Power density
#7,018 vs #5,070
AE CMD-108BDS 435W leads by 1,948 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,746 vs #8,229
AE CMD-108BDS 435W leads by 1,517 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,941 vs #5,914
AE CMD-108BDS 435W leads by 4,027 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-580
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-575
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-570
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-440
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W has higher module efficiency (22.31% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.