Skip to main content
435W vs 425W 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W

AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W
CMD-108BDE-435W
435 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W
CMD-108BDE-425W
425 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

435W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 435W 425W Difference
Module efficiency 22.31 % 21.80 % 0.51 pp more efficient
Power density 223.1 Wp/m² 218.0 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 435 Wp 425 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
435W
14,595 kWh
425W
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 435W 425W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 425 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 407 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 388 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 370 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 435W 425W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 425 Wp +10 W for 435W
Module efficiency 22.31 % 21.80 % +0.51 pp for 435W
Power density 223.1 Wp/m² 218.0 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 435W
Open-circuit voltage 38.66 V 38.26 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.84 V 32.43 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.06 A 13.89 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.25 A 13.11 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 23.5 kg 23.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 55.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,082 vs #7,022
435W leads by 1,940 places
Power density
#5,070 vs #7,018
435W leads by 1,948 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,229 vs #9,746
435W leads by 1,517 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,914 vs #6,904
435W leads by 990 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-420W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-415W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W or AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W?
According to our database: AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435 W has higher module efficiency (22.31% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435 W has a module efficiency of 22.31%, while AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W use vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435 W and AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.