AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.57 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CMD-108BDE-425W
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Module efficiency
21.80 %
23.37 %
1.57 pp more efficient
Rated power
425 Wp
725 Wp
300 W more power
Power density
218.0 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
15.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
23.5 kg
37.0 kg
13.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
38.26 V
49.30 V
11.04 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.89 A
18.46 A
4.57 A apart
Module area
1.950 m²
3.103 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight per kWp
55.3 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
4.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
32.43 V
41.50 V
9.07 V apart
Current at max power
13.11 A
17.47 A
4.36 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMD-108BDE-425W
14,260 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,065 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CMD-108BDE-425W
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
425 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
407 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
388 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
370 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CMD-108BDE-425W
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
425 Wp
725 Wp
+300 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
21.80 %
23.37 %
+1.57 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density
218.0 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+15.7 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage
38.26 V
49.30 V
11.04 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.43 V
41.50 V
9.07 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.89 A
18.46 A
4.57 A apart
Current at max power
13.11 A
17.47 A
4.36 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
1.950 m²
3.103 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
37.0 kg
-13.5 kg for CMD-108BDE-425W
Weight per kWp
55.3 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
-4.3 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,022
vs
#930
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 6,092 places
Power density
#7,018
vs
#923
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 6,095 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,746
vs
#4,382
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 5,364 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,904
vs
#11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 6,893 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-435W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-430W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-420W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDE-415W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CMD-108BDE-425 W and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.