AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CMD-108-440
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Module efficiency
22.57 %
23.37 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
440 Wp
725 Wp
285 W more power
Weight
20.3 kg
37.0 kg
16.7 kg lighter
Power density
225.7 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
38.66 V
49.30 V
10.64 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.30 A
18.46 A
4.16 A apart
Module area
1.950 m²
3.103 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight per kWp
46.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
4.9 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
32.84 V
41.50 V
8.66 V apart
Current at max power
13.40 A
17.47 A
4.07 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMD-108-440
14,763 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,562 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CMD-108-440
CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
440 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
421 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
402 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
383 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CMD-108-440
CME-132BDS-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
440 Wp
725 Wp
+285 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency
22.57 %
23.37 %
+0.80 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density
225.7 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage
38.66 V
49.30 V
10.64 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.84 V
41.50 V
8.66 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.30 A
18.46 A
4.16 A apart
Current at max power
13.40 A
17.47 A
4.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
1.950 m²
3.103 m²
1.153 m² apart
Weight
20.3 kg
37.0 kg
-16.7 kg for CMD-108-440
Weight per kWp
46.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
-4.9 kg/kWp for CMD-108-440
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,882
vs
#930
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 2,952 places
Power density
#3,848
vs
#923
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 2,925 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,011
vs
#4,382
CMD-108-440 leads by 3,371 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,240
vs
#11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 5,229 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CMD-108-440 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CMD-108-440 or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 22.57%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CMD-108-440 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108-440 has a module efficiency of 22.57%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CMD-108-440 use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108-440 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CMD-108-440 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar CMD-108-440 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CMD-108-440 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar CMD-108-440 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.