Skip to main content
AExxxCMD-108BDE vs CMD-108BDS-435W 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W

AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE
AExxxCMD-108BDE
440 Wp 22.57 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W
CMD-108BDS-435W
435 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AExxxCMD-108BDE leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter AExxxCMD-108BDE CMD-108BDS-435W Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 5.2 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 22.57 % 22.31 % 0.26 pp more efficient
Weight 21.5 kg 23.5 kg 2.0 kg lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AExxxCMD-108BDE
14,763 kWh
CMD-108BDS-435W
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AExxxCMD-108BDE CMD-108BDS-435W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 435 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 421 W 416 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 402 W 397 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 383 W 378 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AExxxCMD-108BDE CMD-108BDS-435W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 435 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.57 % 22.31 % +0.26 pp for AExxxCMD-108BDE
Power density 225.7 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 38.95 V 38.46 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.01 V 32.64 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.12 A 14.23 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.33 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 21.5 kg 23.5 kg -2.0 kg for AExxxCMD-108BDE
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp -5.2 kg/kWp for AExxxCMD-108BDE
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for CMD-108BDS-435W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,882 vs #5,082
AExxxCMD-108BDE leads by 1,200 places
Power density
#3,848 vs #5,070
AExxxCMD-108BDE leads by 1,222 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,535 vs #8,229
AExxxCMD-108BDE leads by 5,694 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,638 vs #5,914
CMD-108BDS-435W leads by 2,724 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE or AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W?
According to our database: AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE has higher module efficiency (22.57% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W?
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE has a module efficiency of 22.57%, while AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 W is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE use vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W?
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W?
AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435W bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AExxxCMD-108BDE and AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.