AE Solar AE ME-132 660W vs AE Solar MD-144BS-545W
VS
The verdict
AE ME-132 660W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 115 W more power. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE ME-132 660W
MD-144BS-545W
Difference
Rated power
660 Wp
545 Wp
115 W more power
Weight
31.5 kg
26.5 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
45.90 V
50.01 V
4.11 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.43 A
13.62 A
4.81 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.581 m²
0.522 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power
37.80 V
42.38 V
4.58 V apart
Current at max power
17.46 A
12.86 A
4.60 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE ME-132 660W
22,144 kWh
MD-144BS-545W
18,286 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,858 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE ME-132 660W
MD-144BS-545W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
660 W
545 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
626 W
516 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
593 W
488 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
559 W
459 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE ME-132 660W
MD-144BS-545W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
660 Wp
545 Wp
+115 W for AE ME-132 660W
Module efficiency
21.27 %
21.12 %
Effectively the same
Power density
212.7 Wp/m²
211.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
45.90 V
50.01 V
4.11 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.80 V
42.38 V
4.58 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.43 A
13.62 A
4.81 A apart
Current at max power
17.46 A
12.86 A
4.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for AE ME-132 660W
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.581 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
26.5 kg
-5.0 kg for MD-144BS-545W
Weight per kWp
47.7 kg/kWp
48.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for AE ME-132 660W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.55 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,849
vs
#9,255
AE ME-132 660W leads by 406 places
Power density
#8,718
vs
#9,256
AE ME-132 660W leads by 538 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#10,419
AE ME-132 660W leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#1,829
vs
#2,373
AE ME-132 660W leads by 544 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#784
vs
#6,577
AE ME-132 660W leads by 5,793 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 660W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 660W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 650W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 660W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 645W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 660W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 640W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-144BS-545W vs AE Solar ME-132BD-660
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-144BS-545W vs AE Solar AE ME-132BD-660
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE ME-132 660W or AE Solar MD-144BS-545W?
According to our database: AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W has higher module efficiency (21.27% vs 21.12%); AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE ME-132 660W and AE Solar MD-144BS-545W?
AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W has a module efficiency of 21.27%, while AE Solar MD-144BS-545 W is 21.12%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE ME-132 660W use vs AE Solar MD-144BS-545W?
AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W uses PERC cells; AE Solar MD-144BS-545 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE ME-132 660W and AE Solar MD-144BS-545W?
AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar MD-144BS-545 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE ME-132 660W and AE Solar MD-144BS-545W bifacial panels?
AE Solar MD-144BS-545 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.