AE Solar AE ME-132 655W vs AE Solar MD-120BD-440
VS
The verdict
AE ME-132 655W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.69 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE ME-132 655W
MD-120BD-440
Difference
Module efficiency
21.11 %
20.42 %
0.69 pp more efficient
Rated power
655 Wp
440 Wp
215 W more power
Weight
31.5 kg
25.5 kg
6.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
48.1 kg/kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
9.9 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Power density
211.1 Wp/m²
204.2 Wp/m²
6.9 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
45.70 V
41.35 V
4.35 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.38 A
13.47 A
4.91 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.155 m²
0.948 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power
17.42 A
12.71 A
4.71 A apart
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
37.60 V
34.62 V
2.98 V apart
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1902x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1902x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE ME-132 655W
21,977 kWh
MD-120BD-440
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,214 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE ME-132 655W
MD-120BD-440
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
655 W
440 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
622 W
417 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
588 W
394 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
555 W
371 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE ME-132 655W
MD-120BD-440
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
655 Wp
440 Wp
+215 W for AE ME-132 655W
Module efficiency
21.11 %
20.42 %
+0.69 pp for AE ME-132 655W
Power density
211.1 Wp/m²
204.2 Wp/m²
+6.9 Wp/m² for AE ME-132 655W
Open-circuit voltage
45.70 V
41.35 V
4.35 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.60 V
34.62 V
2.98 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.38 A
13.47 A
4.91 A apart
Current at max power
17.42 A
12.71 A
4.71 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for AE ME-132 655W
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1902x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1902x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.155 m²
0.948 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
25.5 kg
-6.0 kg for MD-120BD-440
Weight per kWp
48.1 kg/kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
-9.9 kg/kWp for AE ME-132 655W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for AE ME-132 655W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.55 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,013 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,252
vs
#11,555
AE ME-132 655W leads by 2,303 places
Power density
#9,261
vs
#11,566
AE ME-132 655W leads by 2,305 places
Heat behaviour
#8,759
vs
#10,400
AE ME-132 655W leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#2,048
vs
#11,478
AE ME-132 655W leads by 9,430 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#936
vs
#10,595
AE ME-132 655W leads by 9,659 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 655W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 660W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 655W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 650W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 655W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 645W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ME-132 655W vs AE Solar AE ME-132 640W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-440 vs AE Solar ME-132BD-660
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-440 vs AE Solar AE ME-132BD-660
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE ME-132 655W or AE Solar MD-120BD-440?
According to our database: AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W has higher module efficiency (21.11% vs 20.42%); AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE ME-132 655W and AE Solar MD-120BD-440?
AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W has a module efficiency of 21.11%, while AE Solar MD-120BD-440 is 20.42%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE ME-132 655W use vs AE Solar MD-120BD-440?
AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W uses PERC cells; AE Solar MD-120BD-440 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE ME-132 655W and AE Solar MD-120BD-440?
AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar MD-120BD-440 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE ME-132 655W and AE Solar MD-120BD-440 bifacial panels?
AE Solar MD-120BD-440 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE ME-132 655 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.